The hand of mystery dating back to king solomon

The hand of mystery dating back to king solomon

Sumo Wrestling: From Ritual Origins to Honorable Sport. The famous Temple of Solomon might not have been the first or only temple the hand of mystery dating back to king solomon the Holy Land. If all you know about Solomon is he once threatened to cut a baby in half and the most uncomfortably sexy book of the Bible is named after him, you've got a lot to learn. Guess what? Animals Meet the bat that eats other bats. Last year he and his team were uncovering the remains of several walled structures, including a fortified gate, when they discovered what appeared to be animal excrement of relatively recent origin. He not only allowed the worship of strange gods within his household, he even began worshiping them himself, building places of worship for a god known as "the abomination of Moab" and the Ammonite god Moloch, whose traditional worship included sacrificing children.

Read This Next

David Tee - AncientPages. com - The Temple Mount is probably the most fragile place on earth. It is also the most incendiary site as well. Any disruption to the site and its Islamic heritage could start a holy war of enormous proportions. Left: Solomon and the plan for the First Temple, illustration from a Bible card published by the Providence Lithograph Co. Credit: Public Domain - Right: Artist's interpretation of the first Temple in Jerusalem.

Credit: Israel Truths. The hand of mystery dating back to king solomon should be mentioned that Solomon had to build a special area to hold his temple when he started construction. That location was near or on Mt. Moriah, the mountain Abraham went to in order to obey God and sacrifice Isaac. The Bible does contain descriptions of the building but through the years those architectural terms have lost their meaning. Then there are a lot of details absent from the biblical text. While we get great detail on some of the contents of the temple, generalities prevail when it comes to the overall size and dimensions of the building.

The closest example of what his temple may have looked like comes from Syria. The Ain Dara temple is the only building known today that resembles the description given in the book of Kings. Sadly, the archaeologist who excavated this site was Syrian and he wrote in German. This may be the reason why it has received such little attention. Some people may ask, why not just go and dig up the temple and see for yourselves?

But that is impractical and also highly dangerous. In an artistic representation, King Solomon dedicates the Temple at Jerusalem painting by James Tissot or follower, c. Credit: Public Domain. Any digging at the site would contaminate the sacred nature of the Dome, undermine its foundations and anger the Muslim people worldwide.

It would be difficult to assess what was uncovered and attach it to Solomon, Zerubbabel or Herod. We say may because there is a scholar who disagrees with her. But he points out that Herod could not touch the eastern wall because it Solomon built it on the edge of the steep hill leading down to the Kidron Valley. It would be impossible for Herod to bury this part of the wall.

Due to the work of the temple sifting project, the hand of mystery dating back to king solomon, many items from the first temple era have been uncovered. Most of these discoveries are broken pottery, animal bones etc. The most highly debated of all the discoveries is the ivory pomegranate. But its authenticity has been debated since the s. Copyright © AncientPages. com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of AncientPages.

Biblical Archaeology. Times Of Israel. BAR, 13 3. Wood Bible and Spade, 7, Artifacts Oct 22, What Was The Extreme Ritual Of Sokushinbutsu? Ancient Traditions And Customs Jun 20, Magnetic Compass Was Invented In Ancient China Ancient History Facts Mar 18, Secret Ancient Knowledge Of Venus — Controversial Theory And Surprising Discovery — Part 1 Civilizations Jun 30, Tags: AbrahamAin Dara TempleBabyloniansBiblical mysteriesIsaacJerusalemJesusKing HerodKing SolomonSolomon's TempleSyriaThe hand of mystery dating back to king solomon MountZerubbabel.

More From Ancient Pages Location Of Elusive Spanish Fort The hand of mystery dating back to king solomon Now Verified By Florida And Georgia Archaeologists Archaeology Apr 24, Featured Stories Nov 2, Archaeology Jul 9, Archaeology Jan 26, Artifacts Feb 29, Archaeology Jun 16, Featured Stories Jun 12, Archaeology May 22, Ancient History Facts Apr 4, the hand of mystery dating back to king solomon, Archaeology Feb 16, Featured Stories Dec 21, Archaeology Sep 15, Celtic Mythology May 30, Featured Stories Mar 21, Archaeology May 17, Artifacts Oct 22, Ancient Traditions And Customs Jun 20, Ancient History Facts Mar 18, Civilizations Jun 30, Copyright © Ancient Pages.

internet dating agencies

In Levy began a multi-year excavation at Khirbat en-Nahas , a site in southern Jordan that Glueck suggested was an ancient center of copper production. Levy and his team dug through more than 20 feet of copper slag waste to reach virgin soil, indicating that metal had been produced there on a massive scale. The mining operation there is not yet linked to Solomon himself, but it does suggest that the region was home to a complex society—most likely the Edomites, the ancient Israelites' antagonists.

The accuracy of biblical passages claiming that King David marched his armies deep into the desert to engage the Edomites has long been debated. The distance to Jerusalem is about miles kilometers , a two week trip by donkey in ancient times. Long distance trade was key to survival at this remote site surrounded by barren desert.

Every necessity had to be hauled in on donkeys—even the nearest water source was 12 miles away—making this a complex and costly undertaking. Whether the Israelites or Edomites achieved such a level of development during the 10 th century B.

remains a hotly debated question, but Ben-Yosef is encouraged by the new finds, which were published in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. Copyright © National Geographic Society Copyright © National Geographic Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Share Tweet Email. Read This Next The resilience of the human spirit captured in 29 stunning images.

These frescoes shattered conventions in Italian art. The universe is expanding faster than it should be. Science The universe is expanding faster than it should be The latest measurements with the Hubble Space Telescope suggest the universe is expanding faster than scientists' models predict—a hint that some unknown ingredient could be at work in the cosmos.

Go Further. Animals These ghostly sea creatures make snow glow in the Arctic. Animals First true millipede found with a record-breaking 1, legs. Animals Puffins have returned to the Gulf of Maine—but for how long? Animals Meet the bat that eats other bats. The archangel Michael gave Solomon the ring with the star of David engraved on it, giving him the power to enslave demons and the king forced them to build the Temple of Jerusalem.

But one demon stole the ring and cast it into the sea where it was eaten by a fish. Solomon was reduced from king to pauper but fortunately…. managed to buy a fish to eat. Guess what? There was the ring. And off he went — back to rule Israel. Bit of an anti-climax.

So Ashley makes do with a stroll down the Via Dolorosa. But unfortunately, their clambering inside these dark passages leads to a dead end. Next, Ashley storms off down a rainy motorway to Tel Meggido — the supposed location for Armageddon.

The End of Days battle! It then transpires that the people who originally lived in Tel Megiddo drifted at some point from the hilltop down into the valley. And the mosaic has been covered in sand. Take the sand away — Ashley demands. The prison guide refuses. But he offers Ashley some photographs taken before the preserving sand was laid down.

There are two fishes in the mosaic — hmmm…why is that? Ashley concludes that one fish represents Jesus and the other…. get ready for this…. This clue convinces Ashley that the Christians nabbed the ring. So where would it be now? Rome — naturally! These pillars are theorized by a few to have been structural members supporting the roof of the porch, leading into the Temple.

There was in King Solomon's day, supported between these two pillars, a large traverse screen, or drape, to ward off the wind and retain the late afternoon sun from shining into the Temple itself. One question in our minds might be: Were they an architectural feature or an ornamental feature used to garnish the beauty of the Temple? There is a majority of Masonic scholars who hold to the fact that the two pillars were free standing columns, conceptually ornamental and of emblematic disposition, just as they are depicted in our Fellow craft lecture.

There are satisfactory reason, given elsewhere in other Masonic papers , for the general belief that they were free standing and symbolic in character, being symbols of Deity. The pillars of King Solomon's Temple may have been set up more specifically as an imitation of the obelisks that have been found at the entrance to many Egyptian Temples; additionally they may have been copied from Tyre, the home of Hiram Abif, where it is reported two pillars, which were fashioned of gold and emerald stood guard at the entrance to the Temple of Hercules.

Also in Syria, recent excavations have uncovered a small chapel with two pillars, standing freely near the entrance, which appeared to be purely ornamental or symbolic in design, rather then architecturally supporting any part of the building.

Similarly it is interesting to note that there are some discrepancies between Masonic tradition and the Holy Scriptures, and even some inconsistency between several books of the Bible itself, and also, in the various versions of the Bible. The Biblical description of King Solomon's pillars, in the King James version, and according to the books of II Chronicles, I Kings, and II Kings, is written as follows: II Chronicles Also he made before the House two pillars of thirty and five cubits in heights and the chapiter that was on the top of each of them was made five cubits.

And he made chains, as in the oracle, and put them on the heads of the pillars, and made an hundred pomegranates, and put them on the chains. And he reared up the pillars before the Temple, one on the right hand, and the other on the left; and called the name of that on the right hand "Jachin", and the name of that on the left he called "Boaz". In the plain of Jordan did the King cast them, in the clay ground between Succoth and Zeredathah.

I Kings For he cast two pillars of brass, of eighteen cubits high apiece: and a line of twelve cubits did compass either of them about. And he made two chapiter's of molten brass, to set upon the tops of the pillars: the height of one of the chapiter's was five cubits, and the height of the other chapiter was five cubits. I Kings cont. And the nets of checker work, and wreaths of chain work, for the chapiter which were upon the top of the pillars; seven for one chapiter, and seven for the other chapiter.

II Kings The height of one pillar was eighteen cubits, and the chapiter upon it was brass: and the height of the other chapiter was three cubits; and the wreathing work, and the pomegranates upon the chapiter round about, all of brass and like unto these had the second pillar that of wreath work.

Several sets of discrepancies, with consideration to the pillars, are to be observed in these Biblical accounts. The first of these is in regard to their height, which is given as thirty five cubits in II Chronicles, and as eighteen cubits in the books of I Kings and II Kings.

The length of a cubit is normally taken to be a foot and one half, and the royal cubit, which was used in the building of King Solomon's Temple, was the equivalent to about twenty one inches.

The Genoa Bible, printed in , has this to say:,"Every one was eighteen cubits long, but one half of a cubic could not be seen, for it was hidden in the roundness of the chapiter and therefore he giveth it as seventeen and one half cubits in height.

But as an interesting aspect, in , the Grand Lodge of Iowa took a poll of all other American jurisdictions and one Canadian with respect to the question of Masonic usage of the pillars in their area. Four jurisdiction did not reply, but of the forty four who did, fourteen attested to the fact, that they used the eighteen cubits figure, while twenty seven utilized thirty five cubits as the total height, and one curiously enough used thirty.

Four jurisdictions indicated that the height was either not given or not regarded in their lectures, while one declined giving any information on the grounds that it alleged it to be an improper request. It is universally conceived that the two pillars were cast in one piece, and this common belief is expressed and emphasized in the Fellow craft lecture, which informs us that the pillars were cast of a hollow nature and to function as repositories.

This explanation is only partially correct. For from a foundry man's viewpoint they may have been cast a handbreadth, or four inches in thickness, not only to reduce the weight, but also to simplify the casting.

As a result the central core of sand or clay was, most surely and laboriously, scooped out to aid the workers to trans-port and erect these mammoth pillars. The brass castings in themselves would have weighed about twenty seven tons, and being confronted with the task of moving so massive of a casting the twenty five miles or so from their origin, in the clay ground between Succoth and Zeredathah to their destination of King Solomon's Temple, would have necessitated that they were cast in a hollow fashion.

We should though, bear in mind, that a pair of obelisks in front of the Temple of Karnak, which was erected some four centuries before King Solomon's Pillars, were said to have been almost ninety eight feet in height, and to have weighed approximately three hundred and fifty tons each. Such pillars in the Babylonian era were made hollow and contained the rules of deportment and behavior, as well as the etiquette governing the rites of the religious ceremonies, also to carefully preserve the properties, and the precious ancient writings.